FW: [psg.com #322] AutoReply: Textual Convention Names (Prefix)

The following is the proposed resolution to entstate-322. The issue will be
considered closed with no changes made to the document.

There were various bits of discussion on the list on when it is appropriate
to use a MIB specific prefix on a textual convention and when it does not.
As the intention on these textual conventions is for general use it would
seem that a prefix is not appropriate. The proposal is to keep the names as
is.

Sharon
-----Original Message-----
From: entity-state [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 2:33 PM
To: Chisholm, Sharon [CAR:0S00:EXCH]
Subject: [psg.com #322] AutoReply: Textual Convention Names (Prefix)

<clip>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Andy Bierman [[email protected]]

the TCs should be named with a prefix. E.g.,
OperState -> EntityOperState.  This applies to
all the TCs in the draft.