Re: Draft Entity MIB Minutes

Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.entmib
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hi Randy,

You probably did make a stronger statement and I failed to
capture it.  Sorry.  I'll update the minutes accordingly.

Margaret


At 04:32 PM 11/26/2002 -0800, Randy Presuhn wrote:
>Hi -
>
> > Message-Id: <[email protected]>
> > Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 20:05:51 -0500
> > To: [email protected]
> > From: Margaret Wasserman <[email protected]>
> > Subject: [Entmib] Draft Entity MIB Minutes
>...
> > Below are the draft minutes for our meeting.  Please let me know
> > if you have any comments.
>...
> > Randy Presuhn:  Thinks this should be a sparse augments.  Nothing
> > in the ITU document indicates otherwise.  ...
>...
>
>I thought I made it a much stronger statement.  If I didn't,
>then I should clarify anyway: the ISO/ITU state management
>function is very explicit that class definitions should only
>employ the state attributes that make sense, that it's not an
>"all or nothing" proposition.  If the phrase "sparse augments"
>were in their vocabulary, it would have been used.
>
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  Randy Presuhn          BMC Software, Inc.  SJC-1.3141
>  [email protected]  2141 North First Street
>  Tel: +1 408 546-1006   San José, California 95131  USA
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>  My opinions and BMC's are independent variables.
>  ------------------------------------------------------
>_______________________________________________
>Entmib mailing list
>[email protected]
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/entmib
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.