Re: Re: I-D Action:draft-hoeneisen-enum-x-service-regs-02.txt

Hi Romek

On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Romek Szczesniak wrote:

> draft-hoeneisen-enum-x-service-regs-02.txt. I haven't seen any discussion on 
> it here so I thought I would.

Nice idea!

Inline some questions for clarification.

> (iii) when a client does not wish a service type to be evaluated by a 
> standards-based ENUM clients.

I do not understand the use case you describe here. Could you please 
enlighten this a bit?

> I suggest that:
>
> 1. We specify that X- services SHOULD follow the same syntax as other 
> registered services (so that ENUM clients do not break on receipt of such 
> rules).

For what reason do you think ENUM clients would break?
Do you mean the "-" char, which is not allowed as per RFC3761?

> 2. Provide a standardised mechanism for service types (if needed for public 
> use) to be appended to the list of Enum service types after review. This 
> review period should be at most about 6 months (to prevent all service types 
> remaining as X- ).

Do you mean any X-Enumservice should expire latest after 6 months and be 
removed from the IANA registry?

cheers,
  Bernie