Re: Future Enumservice Registration Process
Otmar Lendl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 2007/11/02 16:11, Richard Shockey <[email protected]> wrote: > Bernie this is a excellent summary of the options. > > Chair hat off ... I lean toward Plan B. > > The registration proceeds directly to the expert review via a special email > list like we see with URI's. The expert review deals with it in a > "reasonable" time frame and forwards its report to the IESG for ultimate > approval. As I had the pleasure of test-driving 2929bis, I don't like B. The reason is that hard to guarantee SLAs from experts. In that case, what happens if the exports don't react in the given time frame? What happens in that case? When everything works as planned, all four processes are fine. The things we should have an eye on are the faultlines. What happens if something doesn't go according to plan? /ol -- / Otmar Lendl <[email protected]>, T: +43 1 5056416 - 33, F: - 933 \ | nic.at Internet Verwaltungs- und Betriebsgesellschaft m.b.H | \ http://www.nic.at/ LG Salzburg, FN 172568b, Sitz: Salzburg /