Re: New I-D:draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00.txt
Tony Rutkowski <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Paul, >That doesn't really hold true for non licensed/corporate communications >in most instances (as much as some people would like that to be the >case). Taken into a public ENUM context (country sanctioned or not) the >concerns seem valid to me. Article 1 of the Directive establishes the obligations of all "...providers of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks." Public availability rather than licensing is the operative delimitation. E.164 numbers by definition apply to public telecommunication networks. I suppose you could escape the requirements by using your own numbering scheme within networks not available to the public. --tony