Re: New I-D:draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00.txt
Paul Erkkila <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Otmar Lendl wrote: > > > Yes, the incremental change ist not that big. The question remains: > > Have we now reached the point where we should stop fiddling with the > DNS protocol and should instead look for a directory lookup protocol > which was designed from the beginning to support authenticated and > complex queries returning structured data? LDAP? > > As this is not for e164.arpa, but private trees instead, do you actually > need the sub-tree delegation feature of DNS/ENUM? Or is ENUM just used > as a simple query protocol into a single database? Not to discount the vast deployment of DNS, but i think delegation is one of the key draws for many implementations. Even data controlled by a single entity can benefit from the hierarchy and scaling opportunities that build from it. > > /ol -pee