Re: New I-D:draft-kaplan-enum-source-uri-00.txt
Paul Erkkila <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Otmar Lendl wrote: > On 2007/12/12 16:12, Paul Erkkila <[email protected]> wrote: >> Otmar Lendl wrote: >>> >>> Yes, the incremental change ist not that big. The question remains: >>> >>> Have we now reached the point where we should stop fiddling with the >>> DNS protocol and should instead look for a directory lookup protocol >>> which was designed from the beginning to support authenticated and >>> complex queries returning structured data? >> LDAP? > > Hold your horses. > > All I want here is to step back and re-evaluate whether DNS is still > the appropriate baseline protocol on top of which you want to build > your application. We're piling extension upon extension here. At some > point, the foundations will crack and we can't patch over the > limitations (or better, assumptions) of the initial design any longer. > > I'm not claiming (nor ruling out) we're there yet. I did not suggest alternative protocol. > > We just need to think this through. > > /ol Was just pointing out your query protocol already exists, not suggesting we use it ;). I completely agree that re-evaluation is needed here as we use the DNS in unique ways. -pee