3761bis and enumservices-guide
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0801081613000.3776@machb> |
Hi,
Trying to finish the enumservices-guide, we came accross some
conflicts/overlaps between 3761bis and enumservices-guide.
So far I have identified the following issues:
1) IANA registration template:
- Shall we keep it in 3761bis and update it?
- Shall we move all the IANA staff over to enumservices-guide?
- Changes so far are:
- adding a "Enumservice Class"
- adding a reference (URL?) to the specification
- no longer RFC required, but specification required
2) references between RCF3761, 3761bis and enumservices-guide
- Leads to a publication timing issue
- Status of enumservices-guide might need to be promoted to standards
track (not just bcp)
- This is also dependent on 1)
3) For the experimental services, the ABNF needs to be corrected to
explicitly allow 'X-' prefix.
There might be some more issues, but I guess the above are the major ones to be
resolved.
Any opinions?
cheers,
Bernie