RE: 3761bis and enumservices-guide

IMHO the entire IANA registration process should be moved to the
Enumservices guide and that that the document should be proposed standard.

Anyone else care to comment?

3761 bis can then refer to this RFC.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: Bernie Hoeneisen [mailto:[email protected]]
>  Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 10:15 AM
>  To: [email protected]
>  Subject: [Enum] 3761bis and enumservices-guide
>  
>  Hi,
>  
>  Trying to finish the enumservices-guide, we came accross some
>  conflicts/overlaps between 3761bis and enumservices-guide.
>  
>  
>  So far I have identified the following issues:
>  
>  
>  1)  IANA registration template:
>      - Shall we keep it in 3761bis and update it?
>      - Shall we move all the IANA staff over to enumservices-guide?
>      - Changes so far are:
>        - adding a "Enumservice Class"
>        - adding a reference (URL?) to the specification
>        - no longer RFC required, but specification required
>  
>  
>  2) references between RCF3761, 3761bis and enumservices-guide
>      - Leads to a publication timing issue
>      - Status of enumservices-guide might need to be promoted to
>  standards
>        track (not just bcp)
>      - This is also dependent on 1)
>  
>  
>  3) For the experimental services, the ABNF needs to be corrected to
>      explicitly allow 'X-' prefix.
>  
>  
>  There might be some more issues, but I guess the above are the major
>  ones to be
>  resolved.
>  
>  Any opinions?
>  
>  cheers,
>    Bernie
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  enum mailing list
>  [email protected]
>  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum