Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

The solution to the looking forward problem is easily applied to the looking
backward problem.

If the proxy controlling the dialing for an old device has access to the
same data the new device that is controlling the dialing has, then the
problem is solved.

The send-n solution isn't applicable to a device with a SEND button in a
sensible way.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
> [email protected]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 11:34 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Enum] Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
> 
> "Brian Rosen" <[email protected]> wrote on 24/06/2008 16:09:22:
> 
> > I think overlapped dialing is going away, and devices need to be told
> how
> > many digits to collect before pressing "SEND" or the equivalent.
> 
> I disagree.
> 
> The particular application where this has real use is standard POTS phones
> sending DTMF into a switch that uses ENUM-like technology to route the
> call onwards.
> 
> There's no way to make those current devices do a "send", and there's
> *millions* of them out there.
> 
> Ray
> 
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum