Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <OF3161F4AA.CA5015C2-ON80257472.0058698D-80257472.0058E2F0@nominet.org.uk>
> The solution to the looking forward problem is easily applied to the 
looking
> backward problem.
> 
> If the proxy controlling the dialing for an old device has access to the
> same data the new device that is controlling the dialing has, then the
> problem is solved.

I don't follow your reasoning.  The soft switch I described doesn't have 
internal number length information, it only has a DNS interface to an 
ENUM-like database tree.

This isn't hypothetical, BTW.  It's how the UK's number portability 
solution is expected to work.

> The send-n solution isn't applicable to a device with a SEND button in a
> sensible way.

Yes, that's correct.  It's not supposed to be.

Ray
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.