Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <OF3161F4AA.CA5015C2-ON80257472.0058698D-80257472.0058E2F0@nominet.org.uk> |
> The solution to the looking forward problem is easily applied to the looking > backward problem. > > If the proxy controlling the dialing for an old device has access to the > same data the new device that is controlling the dialing has, then the > problem is solved. I don't follow your reasoning. The soft switch I described doesn't have internal number length information, it only has a DNS interface to an ENUM-like database tree. This isn't hypothetical, BTW. It's how the UK's number portability solution is expected to work. > The send-n solution isn't applicable to a device with a SEND button in a > sensible way. Yes, that's correct. It's not supposed to be. Ray