Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
"Clive D.W. Feather" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian Rosen said: > The solution to the looking forward problem is easily applied to the looking > backward problem. What is the "solution to the looking forward problem"? > If the proxy controlling the dialing for an old device has access to the > same data the new device that is controlling the dialing has, then the > problem is solved. What data? The problem is that the devices don't have this data. > The send-n solution isn't applicable to a device with a SEND button in a > sensible way. Agreed. A device with a SEND button either gets the right length given to it *by the user* or it doesn't. So what? -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <[email protected]> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <[email protected]> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |