Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
"Clive D.W. Feather" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Brian Rosen said: > Implement something else (i.e. a client to another database which has length > information) in the same server. > > It's possible that we'll decide the protocol for this new database is DNS. And if we do decide this, it ought to minimize the number of DNS lookups. Which means returning NAPTR records. > I have no opinion on that yet. I have an opinion that we should have a > database with length information that all services, and all devices, can > make use of. Send-n is too limited, in my opinion. What doesn't it do that your proposed new protocol would do? -- Clive D.W. Feather | Work: <[email protected]> | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 Internet Expert | Home: <[email protected]> | Fax: +44 870 051 9937 Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646 THUS plc | |