Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

"Brian Rosen" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Read the thread.

What you want is a dial plan.  Fine, we should standardize a way to get a
dial plan for every TN.  In nearly every case, that comes from the
regulator.  There are conditions where what you get from the regulator is a
dial plan that determines the end of a "prefix" and you have to go somewhere
else to get the rest of the dial plan.  Fine, we can do that.

99% of the telephone numbers in the world have a pretty simple dial plan.
That's the case we should optimize.    

Overlapped dialing decoding is walking through a dial plan.  We should
provide the means to do that.  All of the hundreds of millions of phones you
are talking about work fine without Send-N.  They have the dial plan for the
home country burnt into the switch, and they use a time out for
international numbers.  

There is value in improving the dialing experience of everyone, but not so
much that we need make it really optimal.  You have brought us a problem I
think is worth solving: determining dial plans for international numbers.  I
don't like your solution, but I'm happy to work on the problem.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Clive D.W. Feather [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:45 AM
> To: Brian Rosen
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Enum] Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
> 
> Brian Rosen said:
> > I still have my objection to the basic notion that the base enum query
> is
> > the right way to determine how many digits are needed to route.  I think
> > that information is static,
> 
> It's not *that* static, particularly in some countries.
> 
> > and we need a standardized way to find it out,
> 
> Right.
> 
> > and send-n is not the right way to do that.
> 
> Then what is? Preferably without *adding* to the number of lookups
> required
> when the "standardized method" isn't in place.
> 
> > I think overlapped dialing is
> > going away,
> 
> Why on earth? There are hundreds of millions of devices that do overlapped
> dialling, and they aren't going to be replaced any time soon.
> 
> > and devices need to be told how many digits to collect before
> > pressing "SEND" or the equivalent.
> 
> Where's '"SEND" or the equivalent' on my home phone?
> 
> --
> Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  <[email protected]>   | Tel:    +44 20 8495
> 6138
> Internet Expert     | Home:  <[email protected]>  | Fax:    +44 870 051
> 9937
> Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
> THUS plc            |                            |
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.