Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

Duane wrote:
> It gets 'broken' because send-n will interfere with wild card records
> because in most case the most specific record should take preference.

I still don't understand your objection.

If a specific record over-rides a wildcard containing a Send-N record, so 
what?!

That just means that the switch implementing Send-N will keep on asking 
for digits (one at a time) until the full number is found[*]

Can you provide an actual example zone showing how this doesn't work?

Ray

[*] Yes, I know looking up partial numbers breaks Section 2 of RFC3761. 
However IMHO that paragraph is unnecessarily restrictive because nothing 
ever actually breaks if that "rule" is broken.  This is unfortunately a 
necessary step if overlapped dialling is ever to work in I-ENUM.