Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published
Roy Arends <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 1, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Duane wrote: > Clive D.W. Feather wrote: > >> The same happens if you put an A record at a higher level. So don't >> do that. > > Only if you request ANY/ALL, if you specifically request NAPTR it > shouldn't, which is why someone else suggested you make a new DNS type > to store send-n against then naptr wouldn't break except for the case > where someone requested ANY/ALL Regardless of the type at the higher name, simply the existence of a name will cause wildcards not to expand for that name. As an example using the following records: bob.harry.example TXT test *.example NAPTR [whatever] Will cause the following queries NOT to result in a wildcard expansion: example NAPTR harry.example NAPTR bob.harry.example NAPTR john.bob.harry.example NAPTR All these will lead to NODATA errors (RCODE=0 plus empty answer section) Regards, Roy