Re: Send-N draft: draft-bellis-enum-send-n-02 published

Roy Arends <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Jul 1, 2008, at 12:19 AM, Duane wrote:

> Clive D.W. Feather wrote:
>
>> The same happens if you put an A record at a higher level. So don't  
>> do that.
>
> Only if you request ANY/ALL, if you specifically request NAPTR it
> shouldn't, which is why someone else suggested you make a new DNS type
> to store send-n against then naptr wouldn't break except for the case
> where someone requested ANY/ALL

Regardless of the type at the higher name, simply the existence of a  
name will cause wildcards not to expand for that name.

As an example using the following records:

bob.harry.example TXT   test
*.example           NAPTR [whatever]

Will cause the following queries NOT to result in a wildcard expansion:

example NAPTR
harry.example NAPTR
bob.harry.example NAPTR
john.bob.harry.example NAPTR

All these will lead to NODATA errors (RCODE=0 plus empty answer section)

Regards,

Roy
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.