Re: ENUM WG Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt

Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:16:07 -0600
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.enum
Message-ID <[email protected]>
My suggestion of the easiest way to solve this would be to IETF Last  
Call draft-ietf-enum-iax calling out a 3967 downref to draft-guy-iax-04.


On Sep 7, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Peter Koch wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:
>
>> Title                 : IANA Registration for IAX Enumservice
>> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt
>
>> A two week WG last call on this document concluded on July 7, 2008.
>>
>> The document listed above is being considered for Proposed Standard.
>
> so, for the process addicts amongst us - what is the solution to the
> downref problem?
> There is a normative reference to <draft-guy-iax-04.txt> and  
> rightfully so.
> This drafts sits in the RFC Editor queue for publication as  
> Informational.
> RFC 3967, section 2, first bullet item, could be read as a way out  
> of this,
> but I doubt it could be appropriately invoked: the only reason that
> draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt is aiming at Standards Track is that that  
> has been
> the only way to get an enum service registered since RRFC 3761.
> Now, the IANA registration document update for ENUM services is in  
> WGLC
> now and hopefully can be shipped to the IESG soon.  This eliminates  
> the
> need for draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt going to proposed.  Instead,  
> I've had
> hoped - apologies if you heard this a couple of times already - we  
> could
> have processed draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt under the upcoming ENUM  
> services
> guidelines with an exception granted from the IESG as it was done with
> RFC2929bis.
>
> What's the plan?
>
> -Peter
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum