Re: ENUM WG Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt
Cullen Jennings <[email protected]> Wed, 17 Sep 2008 12:16:07 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
My suggestion of the easiest way to solve this would be to IETF Last Call draft-ietf-enum-iax calling out a 3967 downref to draft-guy-iax-04. On Sep 7, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Peter Koch wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Richard Shockey wrote: > >> Title : IANA Registration for IAX Enumservice >> Filename : draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt > >> A two week WG last call on this document concluded on July 7, 2008. >> >> The document listed above is being considered for Proposed Standard. > > so, for the process addicts amongst us - what is the solution to the > downref problem? > There is a normative reference to <draft-guy-iax-04.txt> and > rightfully so. > This drafts sits in the RFC Editor queue for publication as > Informational. > RFC 3967, section 2, first bullet item, could be read as a way out > of this, > but I doubt it could be appropriately invoked: the only reason that > draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt is aiming at Standards Track is that that > has been > the only way to get an enum service registered since RRFC 3761. > Now, the IANA registration document update for ENUM services is in > WGLC > now and hopefully can be shipped to the IESG soon. This eliminates > the > need for draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt going to proposed. Instead, > I've had > hoped - apologies if you heard this a couple of times already - we > could > have processed draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt under the upcoming ENUM > services > guidelines with an exception granted from the IESG as it was done with > RFC2929bis. > > What's the plan? > > -Peter > _______________________________________________ > enum mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum