Re: ENUM WG Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt

Hi Cullen

Peter has suggested to test-run the new Enumservice registration process.
The document defining this process (draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-12)
is currently in WG LC.

Is the IESG interested in such a test-run of the new Enum Registration process
as it has been done with 2929bis? The IAX Enumservice registration
(draft-ietf-enum-iax-04) is a perfect sample for this.


cheers,
 Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:16 PM
To: Peter Koch
Cc: [email protected]; 'Peterson, Jon'
Subject: Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt


My suggestion of the easiest way to solve this would be to IETF Last Call draft-ietf-enum-iax calling out a 3967 downref to draft-guy-iax-04.


On Sep 7, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Peter Koch wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:
>
>> Title                 : IANA Registration for IAX Enumservice
>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt
>
>> A two week WG last call on this document concluded on July 7, 2008.
>>
>> The document listed above is being considered for Proposed Standard.
>
> so, for the process addicts amongst us - what is the solution to the
> downref problem?
> There is a normative reference to <draft-guy-iax-04.txt> and
> rightfully so.
> This drafts sits in the RFC Editor queue for publication as
> Informational.
> RFC 3967, section 2, first bullet item, could be read as a way out of
> this, but I doubt it could be appropriately invoked: the only reason
> that draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt is aiming at Standards Track is that
> that has been the only way to get an enum service registered since
> RRFC 3761.
> Now, the IANA registration document update for ENUM services is in
> WGLC now and hopefully can be shipped to the IESG soon.  This
> eliminates the need for draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt going to proposed.
> Instead, I've had hoped - apologies if you heard this a couple of
> times already - we could have processed draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt
> under the upcoming ENUM services guidelines with an exception granted
> from the IESG as it was done with RFC2929bis.
>
> What's the plan?
>
> -Peter
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum