Re: ENUM WG Request for Publication - draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt

That would be up to Jon but I'd be sort of surprised to see the IESG  
user the process in 2929bis that before 2929bis was approved (not an  
RFC but past the IESG approval step). However if 2929bis is in WGLC  
now, that might be relatively soon so perhaps one should just wait and  
then do enum-iax.


On Sep 18, 2008, at 2:46 AM, <[email protected]> <[email protected] 
 > wrote:

> Hi Cullen
>
> Peter has suggested to test-run the new Enumservice registration  
> process.
> The document defining this process (draft-ietf-enum-enumservices- 
> guide-12)
> is currently in WG LC.
>
> Is the IESG interested in such a test-run of the new Enum  
> Registration process
> as it has been done with 2929bis? The IAX Enumservice registration
> (draft-ietf-enum-iax-04) is a perfect sample for this.
>
>
> cheers,
> Bernie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf  
> Of Cullen Jennings
> Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2008 8:16 PM
> To: Peter Koch
> Cc: [email protected]; 'Peterson, Jon'
> Subject: Re: [Enum] ENUM WG Request for Publication - draft-ietf- 
> enum-iax-04.txt
>
>
> My suggestion of the easiest way to solve this would be to IETF Last  
> Call draft-ietf-enum-iax calling out a 3967 downref to draft-guy- 
> iax-04.
>
>
> On Sep 7, 2008, at 2:23 PM, Peter Koch wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 02:41:06PM -0400, Richard Shockey wrote:
>>
>>> Title                 : IANA Registration for IAX Enumservice
>>>     Filename        : draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt
>>
>>> A two week WG last call on this document concluded on July 7, 2008.
>>>
>>> The document listed above is being considered for Proposed Standard.
>>
>> so, for the process addicts amongst us - what is the solution to the
>> downref problem?
>> There is a normative reference to <draft-guy-iax-04.txt> and
>> rightfully so.
>> This drafts sits in the RFC Editor queue for publication as
>> Informational.
>> RFC 3967, section 2, first bullet item, could be read as a way out of
>> this, but I doubt it could be appropriately invoked: the only reason
>> that draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt is aiming at Standards Track is that
>> that has been the only way to get an enum service registered since
>> RRFC 3761.
>> Now, the IANA registration document update for ENUM services is in
>> WGLC now and hopefully can be shipped to the IESG soon.  This
>> eliminates the need for draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt going to proposed.
>> Instead, I've had hoped - apologies if you heard this a couple of
>> times already - we could have processed draft-ietf-enum-iax-04.txt
>> under the upcoming ENUM services guidelines with an exception granted
>> from the IESG as it was done with RFC2929bis.
>>
>> What's the plan?
>>
>> -Peter
>> _______________________________________________
>> enum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum