Re: WG: New Draft: Trunk Group Use in ENUM

>  
>  Daryl is a co-author, so I can comment.  I'm willing to consider it
>  but only  if the ENUM WG chairs feel strongly that this should come over
to us.
>  If  you guys can process it rapidly, and feel it is within your scope,
>  then go  for it.  If you are not sure it is totally in-scope and you
expect to
>  shut down soon so that you cannot move the document ahead, then we could
>  fit this  in as an "implementer-specific" document.  That's a long way of
saying
>  we  can help if you like, but it's really up to you and Patrik.  :-)
>  
>  > Again rewrite this into the existing trunkgroup expired draft? Fine
>  .. send
>  > it to SPEERMINT? No thank you.
>  
>  If you can address it rapidly here in ENUM, you should, IMHO.


Well thanks for your prompt response. 

I just did not want to see what is a pretty simple BCP that solves a real
internal SSP problem that defines no new protocol specification, distract
from ongoing progress in SPEERMINT.