Re: ENUM WG document status
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> Wed, 9 Sep 2009 22:54:29 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Rich Thanks for the summary. My comments/updates inline. On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Richard Shockey wrote: > draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide > ---------------------------------- > > Current Status: Waiting for AD Go-Ahead > > Open issues: There's a problem with the IETF's Expert Review Process in > general, and the Enumservices draft is the document that brought those > problems up :-/ That is unfortunately true....:-( > Bernie has agreed with IANA (Michelle) to add a bit to the text that > closes the loophole in the process. He will submit a new version, and that > will hopefully close that issue. > > ToDo: Wait for new revision (-17) Update: We could close all the open issues and published -17 three weeks ago. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide-17 > draft-ietf-enum-calendar-service > -------------------------------- > > Current Status: RFC Editor (AUTH48) > > Open Issues: Unfortunately, this draft was submitted to the RFC Editor > before work on the Enumservices document was finished - the Enumservice > does not fit at all into the Scheme proposed there. There were several > discussions between RFC Editors, authors of the draft, and authors of > the Enumservices guide, without reaching the "perfect solution". > > ToDo: Find solution how to fit Enumservice into the scheme developed in > Enumservice guide. Update: The issues have been closed and RFC 5333 is expected to be published within the next days. cheers, Bernie