Re: draft-ietf-enum-unused

Hi Bernie, folks,
  Pain? Nah! that doesn't cover it.
Regarding what happened next, not a lot. I suspect that Hadriel  
volunteered without quite understanding what was involved.

I think by that point Richard Stastny (who initially proposed this)  
had retired, Hadriel had implemented this in two flavours for  
customers -- once in accordance to a VOID draft *and* separately in  
accordance with an Unused draft. (I believe that something not a  
million miles away from unused was involved with the Korean ENUM trial  
as well ;).
For me, having moved text in and out and up and down so many time I  
was losing the ability to see, objections to the data: URL (AFAICT ?!? 
because it was intrinsically evil?!? - ask Rohan) left me unconvinced  
that with me at the typewriter there would be any possibility of this  
getting though IESG before *I* retired.
As I can't see anything wrong with it at all in its latest version  
(having replaced the http: URL with a data: URL as requested), I don't  
know any more.
I do know that this works exactly as described in the draft (qua any  
typos that drifted into it over the years) -- and quite well, at that.

Is that enough?

all the best,
   Lawrence

On 9 Sep 2009, at 21:43, Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:
> Hi Rich
>
> AFAICT Cullen's question refers to the pain around points raised by  
> the former AD leading to the editor stepping down.
>
> I found something concering this in the records:
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/enum/minutes?item=minutes71.html
>
> However, I found no records about what happened afterwards....
>
> cheers,
> Bernie
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Richard Shockey wrote:
>
>> How painful do you want to go ... the problem statement is pretty  
>> simple how
>> do you know if a number has been issued to the carrier but not  
>> active or has
>> any services associated with it. The SIT tone issue. The ENUM  
>> database needs
>> a flag to indicate the status of the number.
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
>>> Of Cullen Jennings
>>> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 4:02 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: [Enum] draft-ietf-enum-unused
>>>
>>>
>>> Who is working on this draft these days? I need someone to remind me
>>> of the painful history of this draft.
>>>
>>> Thanks, Cullen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> enum mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> enum mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum
>>
> _______________________________________________
> enum mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum