Review: draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00.txt
Gonzalo Camarillo <[email protected]> Fri, 16 Apr 2010 13:11:51 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi, we are going to focus on finishing the three main documents first. Once we are done with them, we will focus on the rest of the documents (e.g., this one). Here you have some comments on the edns0 draft. Cheers, Gonzalo Review: draft-ietf-enum-edns0-00.txt The acronym EDNS0 should be expanded in the title of the draft. The document adds an operational requirement to RFC 3761. Why doesn't it add it to rfc3761bis instead? Section 2: OLD: and so it is necessary to implement the standard Extension Mechanisms for DNS as described in RFC 2671[7], NEW: and so it is necessary to implement the standard Extension Mechanisms for DNS (EDNS0) as described in RFC 2671 [7], Section 2.1 mentions a few RFCs but does not include references to them. This should be fixed throughout the document. Cheers, Gonzalo