Missing replaced-by information, need help of the ENUM community
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]> Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:05:01 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear ENUM community The WG chairs have been asked to assess the replacement relationships of their WG drafts. The usual case a replacement relationship occurs is when an individual draft gets "promoted" to a Working Group document. While digging and comparing I found quite some missing replaced-by relationships in the annals of Internet-Drafts and reported them to the IESG Secretariat. (Some of you already got "strange" emails from the tracker system because of this...more such emails will be triggered in the next days) For the following I-Ds prefixed by "draft-ietf-enum" I did not find a predecessor: - draft-ietf-enum-3761bis - draft-ietf-enum-enumservices-guide - draft-ietf-enum-infrastructure (RFC 5526) - draft-ietf-enum-rfc2916bis (RFC 3761) - draft-ietf-enum-e164s2-np - draft-ietf-enum-operation - draft-ietf-enum-rqmts - draft-ietf-enum-uri If you know more about the history, i.e. earlier (individual) draft, of any of the above listed documents, please contact me so that the database at the IESG Secretariat can be corrected. cheers, Bernie, Co-chair of the ENUM WG PS: Note that the IPR disclosure search tool uses these replaced-by relationships, so keeping them up-to-date is actually useful and not just WG hygiene. (Lars Eggert)