RE: Proposal cutoff deadline September 15

Glenn, Your question looks good enough to me. 
 
And in case I forget to answer Monday: I think 2. "oops" is the right
approach for this wg to focus.
 
-Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: Glenn Waters [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, September 13, 2002 12:23 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Proposal cutoff deadline September 15



Not that a reminder is necessary, but proposals are due by Monday. 

The three proposals currently on the table are: 

1. Dave Shield's Extended Capability Negotiation 
   www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shield-eos-capabilities-00.txt 

2. Wes Hardaker's Object Oriented PDUs for SNMP 
   www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hardaker-eos-oops-00.txt 
   (soon to be -01) 

3. Glenn Mansfield Keeni's Managed Object / Aggregation MIB modules 
   www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-aggr-mib-01.txt 
   www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-taggr-mib-00.txt 

The WG needs to come to consensus on path forward from here. 

I propose that we select one of the three solutions listed above as the one
solution that the WG will focus on for development.

The question that I plan on asking on Monday is: 

Which of proposals 1, 2, or 3 do you think that the WG should pursue to
focus in on the work items in the charter? 

Is there any discussion around the question?