Re: Proposal cutoff deadline September 15

At 03:22 PM 9/13/2002 -0400, Glenn Waters wrote:

>Not that a reminder is necessary, but proposals are due by Monday. 

We are not just being asked to pick a solution, but rather a
problem and a solution. These 3 drafts address different problems.

I would like to see the WG focus on solution (2), but
incorporate the concepts of (1) into the new PDU format.
I would like to see the problem addressed by (3) solved
with general mechanisms in the protocol, without the
requirement of any pre-configuration by an application.

Andy


>The three proposals currently on the table are: 
>
>1. Dave Shield's Extended Capability Negotiation 
>   www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-shield-eos-capabilities-00.txt 
>
>2. Wes Hardaker's Object Oriented PDUs for SNMP 
>   www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-hardaker-eos-oops-00.txt 
>   (soon to be -01) 
>
>3. Glenn Mansfield Keeni's Managed Object / Aggregation MIB modules 
>   www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-aggr-mib-01.txt 
>   www.ietf.org/draft-glenn-mo-taggr-mib-00.txt 
>
>The WG needs to come to consensus on path forward from here. 
>
>I propose that we select one of the three solutions listed above as the one solution that the WG will focus on for development.
>
>The question that I plan on asking on Monday is: 
>
>Which of proposals 1, 2, or 3 do you think that the WG should pursue to focus in on the work items in the charter? 
>
>Is there any discussion around the question?