Re: Internet FAX WG meeting summary

Claudio Allocchio wrote:
>
>THere are going to be TWO registrations, thus there must be two 
>references to image/tiff and image/tiff-fx registrations. Thus also the 
>above part needs a change for coherence.
>
>Comments?
>

Service-v2-05 draft defines a Simple Mode of Facsimile. It does not 
mention about profiles beyond S. The draft which defines image/tiff-fx 
registration is not normaitve reference. So, I think service draft does 
not need to refer the image/tiff-fx registration draft. 

Regards,

Kiyoshi Toyoda