Re: Request for IESG Consideration for two I-Ds

I think it's worth highlighting that this has a small normative dependency on:

   draft-vaudreuil-1983ext-xx.txt

(it uses a new status code listed there) and it might make sense to 
consider both at the same time.

#g
--

BTW, I don't expect to be at the forthcoming IETF meeting.


At 05:59 PM 3/4/02 +0900, Hiroshi Tamura wrote:
>Timely Completion for Internet Messaging Services
><draft-ietf-fax-timely-delivery-05.txt>
>
>Status: Proposed Standard
>
>Summary:
>
>   This specification provides a way to request timely completion for
>   Internet mail delivery, for services such as facsimile and voice
>   messaging.  Traditional Internet mail uses a _postal_ mail model,
>   with normal delivery having an indeterminate gap between delivery
>   into a mailbox and processing by the recipient.  Timely completion
>   adds a timelines service feature and extends delivery processing
>   all the way to the recipient.  This specification provides a
>   deterministic service quality response, while preserving most of
>   the traditional roles and responsibilities of the agents involved
>   in email transfers.
>
>   It is essentially a profile of the Delivery Service Notification
>   (DSN) and DELIVERBY extensions for ESMTP, along with a new TIMELY
>   option to DELIVERBY with a new deterministic service quality
>   response.
>
>Working Group Last Call Result:
>
>The I-D was submitted for IETF-FAX WG Last Call on November 22 last year.
>During WG LC period, there were no comments.
>It sucessfully finished on December 6. So far, the editors and the
>wg chairs were confirming a few things. Excuse me for my slow action.

------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    Baltimore Technologies
Strategic Research              Content Security Group
<[email protected]>    <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
                                 <http://www.baltimore.com>
------------------------------------------------------------