Re: Request for IESG Consideration for two I-Ds
Hiroshi Tamura <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ned, Patrik, IETF secretary, As Graham commented, I request as follows. Excuse me for it. .................................................... 1 Timely Completion for Internet Messaging Services <draft-ietf-fax-timely-delivery-05.txt> Status: Proposed Standard Summary: This specification provides a way to request timely completion for Internet mail delivery, for services such as facsimile and voice messaging. Traditional Internet mail uses a _postal_ mail model, with normal delivery having an indeterminate gap between delivery into a mailbox and processing by the recipient. Timely completion adds a timelines service feature and extends delivery processing all the way to the recipient. This specification provides a deterministic service quality response, while preserving most of the traditional roles and responsibilities of the agents involved in email transfers. It is essentially a profile of the Delivery Service Notification (DSN) and DELIVERBY extensions for ESMTP, along with a new TIMELY option to DELIVERBY with a new deterministic service quality response. Working Group Last Call Result: The I-D was submitted for IETF-FAX WG Last Call on November 22 last year. During WG LC period, there were no comments. It sucessfully finished on December 6. So far, the editors and the wg chairs were confirming a few things. The I-D has a small normative dependency on draft-vaudreuil-1983ext-xx.txt. It should be considered at the same time. Excuse me for my slow action. ...................... Regarding the second one (draft-ietf-fax-tiff-regbis-04.txt), the original request is valid. ................. Graham, Thanks for your addition. Best Regards, -- Hiroshi Tamura IETF FAX WG co-chair