Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-gateway-protocol-07.txt
Yokoyama <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Wing-san > > > In section 3.3, you need to clearly describe the "X-Header". > > > You also need to provide a reference to S/MIME -- it is > > > mentioned here in section 3.3, but there needs to be a > > > normative or informational reference to S/MIME. > > > > "X-Header" is one of the examples. > > Therefore, we are discussing whether it is removed. > > We (Cisco) support using an X- header for authorization, but > such use isn't standardized. In fact, X- headers cannot be > standardized. How about rewording to talk about something > like "a special vendor-defined header might be used ..." > or something like that? We decided to remove X-Header from the sentence more than reword, because X- headers cannot be standardized. -- K.Yokoyama