RE: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-gateway-protocol-07.txt

Thank you,
-d

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Yokoyama
> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 10:05 PM
> To: Dan Wing
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-fax-gateway-protocol-07.txt
> 
> 
> 
> Wing-san
> 
> 
> > > > In section 3.3, you need to clearly describe the "X-Header".
> > > > You also need to provide a reference to S/MIME -- it is
> > > > mentioned here in section 3.3, but there needs to be a
> > > > normative or informational reference to S/MIME.
> > >
> > > "X-Header" is one of the examples.
> > > Therefore, we are discussing whether it is removed.
> >
> > We (Cisco) support using an X- header for authorization, but
> > such use isn't standardized.  In fact, X- headers cannot be
> > standardized.  How about rewording to talk about something
> > like "a special vendor-defined header might be used ..."
> > or something like that?
> 
> We decided to remove X-Header from the sentence
> more than reword,
> because X- headers cannot be standardized.
> 
> 
> --
> K.Yokoyama
> 
>