RE: AD review comments on

Graham Klyne <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:26:13 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.fax
Message-ID <[email protected]>
This suggests a possible approach of simply pulling all the problematic 
MTA-to-UA stuff from the draft, and simply focusing on timely delivery (in 
the original email sense).

#g
--

At 05:47 AM 9/26/02 -0700, Dan Wing wrote:

>In fax, it's impossible to determine if the user has walked to the
>fax machine and picked up (retrieved) the paper facsimile.  In
>fax, the message is considered "retrievable" when the sender
>completes transmission of the fax.
>
>I don't understand the need to do more with fax-over-SMTP:  if
>the message is "retrievable", you're already duplicating what
>fax on PSTN does today.
>
>
>That said, timely delivery is all good stuff, but I don't
>see a need to redefine "delivery".
>
>-d

-------------------
Graham Klyne
<[email protected]>