RE: AD review comments on
Graham Klyne <[email protected]> Thu, 26 Sep 2002 18:26:13 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
This suggests a possible approach of simply pulling all the problematic MTA-to-UA stuff from the draft, and simply focusing on timely delivery (in the original email sense). #g -- At 05:47 AM 9/26/02 -0700, Dan Wing wrote: >In fax, it's impossible to determine if the user has walked to the >fax machine and picked up (retrieved) the paper facsimile. In >fax, the message is considered "retrievable" when the sender >completes transmission of the fax. > >I don't understand the need to do more with fax-over-SMTP: if >the message is "retrievable", you're already duplicating what >fax on PSTN does today. > > >That said, timely delivery is all good stuff, but I don't >see a need to redefine "delivery". > >-d ------------------- Graham Klyne <[email protected]>