IETF Last Call Results for FAX WG Documents
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:24:13 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.fax |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF03BD17B7@vsvapostal8.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
The IETF last call for these documents: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-09.txt draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-04.txt draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt has concluded. The only comments received were those I provided and some provided by IANA. They can be found in the I-D tracker, but I will repea= t them here for the benefit of the WG. Please note that all three document= s will need to be updated before I will ask the IESG to review them: draft-ietf-fax-esmtp-conneg-09.txt "SUMMARY" should be "ABSTRACT" on the title page. [KEYWORDS] (RFC 2119?) is cited as a reference in the text, but it's not listed among the normative references. // End of comments. draft-ietf-fax-ffpim-04.txt IANA: "We understand there to be NO IANA Actions for this document." Numerous occurrences of a "=C2" non-ASCII character must be removed. Section 4: s/applies/apply/ // End of comments. draft-ietf-fax-faxservice-enum-02.txt: - There's a reference to [KEYWORDS] on the first page, but no such refere= nce exists. Please add a reference to RFC 2119 if that's the reference being described. - The line lengths get a little long in section 3 (I-D nit, "No text beyo= nd the 72nd column of a line"). - In section 4, please change the example to use one of the example domai= n names cited in RFC 2606 instead of "ifax.com". example.com perhaps? - Please split references into normative and informative subsections in section 6 (I-D nit). You can leave informative out if all references are normative. - Update the [ENUMbis] reference to point to RFC 3761. - Remove the reference for [FFPIM]. I don't see it used anywhere in the document. - The boilerplate is outdated, but the RFC Editor will fix that. // End of comments. Please update each document to address the last call comments. Once upda= ted I will ask the IESG to review them. -Scott-