Re: Model: FE Attributes

Any input will be appreciated.
I was hoping to get this in to the I-D editor before the flood for 
the deadline, but that may not happen.

There are a couple of ways forward.
If we get the draft revised without the FE Object information, we can 
submit that, and then submit a revision with the information as soon 
as you make it available to us.
If there are a number of other items where we find that folks are 
promising updates, we can hold off submitting the draft until we get those.

Yours,
Joel  M. Halpern

At 11:10 AM 9/28/2006, Wang,Weiming wrote:
>Joel,
>
>I'm very sorry that I defered inputing something for the FE object 
>as I propsed months ago, owing to the ugly busy business for the 
>university which may have to be ttill Oct. 1st.
>I have to  make the TML SP update first ( which I'm doing) before 
>making things for the FE object, for things I'm to input  is tied to 
>the SP in some way, as we discussed .  Could give me another one or 
>two weeks for this?
>
>While at the same time, I also urge other guys to have more inputs 
>for the FE object attributes.
>
>thanks
>weiming
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>
>
> > I am resending this note to the Forces list.
> > Folks, the FE Object is insufficient.
> > I am quite sure that it needs more information.
> > But without input I can not fix it.
> > I can pretend it is correct.
> > Likely, no reviewer will stop us publishing as is.
> >
> > Please!
> >
> > Section 5.3 notes that the FE Attributes in the FE Object is woefully
> > incomplete.
> > I believe this to be true.
> > However, without input I can not repair this.
> >
> > In the absence of text I will remove the note and we will simply be
> > insufficient.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Joel M. Halpern