Re: model drasft

"Khosravi, Hormuzd M" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Message-ID <F50A4280B6033741B1DD2B4E902258B10237DCA9@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com>
I agree. Not more than 2 new people...and we still need to get the Model
draft out for LC before the next IETF meeting

Thanks
Hormuzd

-----Original Message-----
From: Forwarding and Control Element Separation
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jamal Hadi Salim
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 4:42 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [FORCES] model drasft

On Wed, 2006-27-09 at 16:43 +0200, Patrick Droz wrote:
> I would like to make a suggestion concerning the progress of the
> model draft. Apart from Joel nobody in the authors list has been
> active and we already have the max number of authors reached. So
> I would suggest we put the non active authors into an acknowledgment
> section as "Authors emeritus". This would open up room to find
> new active editors willing to work on the draft. Would there be
> new people willing to work on the model?

I would like to be involved (I should say i have been involved, just not
in editing the document). Without trying to be unreasonable - if again
you have too many people involved, this draft will take a long time to
deliver, so my suggestion is to limit it to no more than 2 new people.

cheers,
jamal
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.