Re: Model: FE Attributes

"Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Message-ID <[email protected]>
It is still a revision of a draft, and therefore subject to the Oct 
23 deadline.
I was merely hoping to beat the Oct 16 rush in which things get lost, 
and people get busy reading other things.

Joel

At 11:52 AM 9/28/2006, Wang,Weiming wrote:
>Joel,
>
>The submission deadline is October 23, Monday, I suppose?  Because 
>the model draft is inactive right now, so, if it can not comply with 
>this deadline and must be with Oct 16 as an initial draft deadline, 
>I suppose to go with the first way,  or, we may directly go with one 
>submission. I can promise to finish my input by 15th.
>
>thanks,
>weiming
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>
>
> > Any input will be appreciated.
> > I was hoping to get this in to the I-D editor before the flood for
> > the deadline, but that may not happen.
> >
> > There are a couple of ways forward.
> > If we get the draft revised without the FE Object information, we can
> > submit that, and then submit a revision with the information as soon
> > as you make it available to us.
> > If there are a number of other items where we find that folks are
> > promising updates, we can hold off submitting the draft until we get those.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Joel  M. Halpern
> >
> > At 11:10 AM 9/28/2006, Wang,Weiming wrote:
> > >Joel,
> > >
> > >I'm very sorry that I defered inputing something for the FE object
> > >as I propsed months ago, owing to the ugly busy business for the
> > >university which may have to be ttill Oct. 1st.
> > >I have to  make the TML SP update first ( which I'm doing) before
> > >making things for the FE object, for things I'm to input  is tied to
> > >the SP in some way, as we discussed .  Could give me another one or
> > >two weeks for this?
> > >
> > >While at the same time, I also urge other guys to have more inputs
> > >for the FE object attributes.
> > >
> > >thanks
> > >weiming
> > >
> > >----- Original Message -----
> > >From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>
> > >
> > > > I am resending this note to the Forces list.
> > > > Folks, the FE Object is insufficient.
> > > > I am quite sure that it needs more information.
> > > > But without input I can not fix it.
> > > > I can pretend it is correct.
> > > > Likely, no reviewer will stop us publishing as is.
> > > >
> > > > Please!
> > > >
> > > > Section 5.3 notes that the FE Attributes in the FE Object is woefully
> > > > incomplete.
> > > > I believe this to be true.
> > > > However, without input I can not repair this.
> > > >
> > > > In the absence of text I will remove the note and we will simply be
> > > > insufficient.
> > > >
> > > > Yours,
> > > > Joel M. Halpern
> >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.