Re: values of LFBClassID wasRe: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt

"tom.petch" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Message-ID <025e01c6f46c$49a78b00$0601a8c0@pc6>
That's a relief; my XML is ok so far.

But what about the
  <id>1</id>
in -protocol; is that something that is no longer in the Schema?

Tom Petch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: values of LFBClassID wasRe: LC model draft
draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt


> You are quite correctly confused.
> Since the model defines the structure, I thought that the model ought
> to take ID 1.
> THe protocol folks were actually defining their object before me, so
> they also thought they should take ID 1.
>
> I think (but am not certain) that we had agreed that the FE Object
> should have ID 1 and the FE Protocol should have ID 2.  And that the
> protocol draft has not been reved since, so does not reflect this agreement.
>
> Yours,
> Joel
>
> At 06:22 AM 10/20/2006, tom.petch wrote:
> >I am confused, at a basic level, by the values of LFBClassID.
> >
> >-protocol IANA Considerations seems clear enough
> >
> >   0x00000001       FE Protocol LFB
> >   0x00000002       FE Object LFB
> >
> >-model contains
> >  <LFBClassDef LFBClassID="1">
> >                <name>FEObject</name>
> >                <synopsis>Core LFB: FE Object</synopsis>
> >                <version>1.0</version>
> >which suggests to me that FEObject is 1
> >
> >while -protocol contains
> >  <LFBClassDef LFBClassID="2">
> >          <name>FEPO</name>
> >          <id>1</id>
> >          <synopsis> The FE Protocol Object</synopsis>
> >          <version>1.0</version>
> >          <derivedFrom>baseclass</derivedFrom>
> >which suggests that FEProtocol is 2 unless <id>1</id> which I cannot
> >find in the
> >schema means it is in fact 1.
> >
> >This may - or may not - reflect my limited knowledge of XML.
> >
> >Tom Petch
> >
> >----- Original Message -----
> >From: "Patrick Droz" <[email protected]>
> >To: <[email protected]>
> >Sent: Friday, October 13, 2006 10:36 AM
> >Subject: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
> >
> >
> > > I would like to issue last call on the model draft. As this is
> > > a fairly large document the LC will last for 3 weeks and will
> > > therefore end just before the next IETF. It is draft:
> > > draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
> > > and can be found at:
> > > http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt
> > >
> > > A number of people have indicated that if the document is in
> > > LC they would thoroughly review the document. I hope people will
> > > stick to their promises.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Patrick
> > >
> > >
> > >
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.