回复:Re: 回复:Re: 回复:ForCES meeting minutes (draft)
"Ma.Huaiyuan 50376" <[email protected]> Fri, 10 Nov 2006 06:54:42 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Dear Joel: In fact, many policies could be applied many times in different FEs rather than just in a single FE, for example, hierachy QoS (HQOS). Best, Michael ----- 原邮件 ----- 发件人: "Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> 日期: 星期四, 十一月 9日, 2006 下午1:10 主题: Re: 回复:Re: 回复:ForCES meeting minutes (draft) > In a ForCES based router, the ingress policies would be applied > on > the board that first receives the packets. It knows what port the > packets arrive on. > I would recommend (but the standard can not mandate) that one use > separate ethernet ports to interconnect the FEs, distinct from the > ports used to send and receive external traffic. But that is an > implementation choice. > > Yours, > Joel M. Halpern > > At 09:15 PM 11/8/2006, you wrote: > >For Example, in traditional router, many policies are based on > >source port in forwarding process. > >for instance, to filter some unwanted traffic based on the source > port,>and source port information could be different for each > packet, and > >destination address in the header of packets > >has no relationship with the source port, given that the source > port > >is carried in meta-data, I do not know how > >to reconstruct this info again when it is needed later. > > > > > >Kind Regards, > > > >Michael >