Re: terminology wa Re: XML basics Re: LC model draft draft-ietf-forces-model-07.txt

Hi, Joel

You means we should change some contents for clarify this both
in model and protocol draft ?

Thanks,
Xiaoyi

2006/11/9, Joel M. Halpern <[email protected]>:
> I think that I understand the question.
> The IDs used in path-data TLVs are not just any arbitrary XML
> elements that happen to have elementID attributes.
> They must be <attribute> <capability> or <event> components.
> This is actually implicit in the fact that other XML "elements" (in
> the XML sense) are not legal in the document.
> When we get the terminology straightened out in both the model and
> the protocol draft, this potential confusion should disappear.
>
> Yours,
> Joel
>