Re: [Model] section 3.2.5

"Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:57:27 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Almost.
We need some word other than "element", since that is an XML term.
But yes, we need a little text that talks about the commonality of 
structure of LFB attributes, LFB capabilities, and Structure components.

Yours,
Joel

At 11:40 AM 12/28/2006, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:

>Sequentially going over the draft ...
>
>and as before, if theres some consensus i will put this in the tracker.
>
>Summary: this is also a readability issue:
>
>Section 3.2.5 references Elements in order to talk about their
>properties.
>Since "Elements" are such a central concept in LFB modelling, I think it
>would make a lot of sense to have a short subsection on LFB Elements
>(derived from the first paragraph) with proper reference for more
>details (currently described as "elsewhere") followed by a subsection on
>Element properties.
>
>cheers,
>jamal