Re: [Model] section 3.2.5
"Joel M. Halpern" <[email protected]> Thu, 28 Dec 2006 13:57:27 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.forces |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Almost. We need some word other than "element", since that is an XML term. But yes, we need a little text that talks about the commonality of structure of LFB attributes, LFB capabilities, and Structure components. Yours, Joel At 11:40 AM 12/28/2006, Jamal Hadi Salim wrote: >Sequentially going over the draft ... > >and as before, if theres some consensus i will put this in the tracker. > >Summary: this is also a readability issue: > >Section 3.2.5 references Elements in order to talk about their >properties. >Since "Elements" are such a central concept in LFB modelling, I think it >would make a lot of sense to have a short subsection on LFB Elements >(derived from the first paragraph) with proper reference for more >details (currently described as "elsewhere") followed by a subsection on >Element properties. > >cheers, >jamal