Re: [MODEL] Resolutions to nouns describing LFB class definitions?

"tom.petch" <[email protected]> Fri, 5 Jan 2007 08:57:39 +0100
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.forces
Message-ID <000901c7309f$35420180$0601a8c0@pc6>
Jamal

There was general agreement that using the same terms as had technical meaning
in XML was likely to cause confusion but there was no consensus on what to
replace the ones in -model with.

Tom Petch


----- Original Message -----
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 5:40 PM
Subject: [MODEL] Resolutions to nouns describing LFB class definitions?


> Joel,
>
> There was a discussion with Tom a while back on the naming conventions
> of LFB attributes and their properties so we avoid conflicting with
> the XML definitions ...
> I cant find anything on the tracker - what was the resolution? As i
> begin scouring section 4 i am finding it unsettling as well.
>
> Can you open a tracker on the change or respond to this and i will.
>
> cheers,
> jamal