Re: LC: draft-ietf-forces-protocol-10.txt>>comments

Jamal,

Note that when not all message bodies are composed of LFBselect TLVs, the descriptions on messages in the V10 become errors. 

I just see it is enough to correct the errors by recovering it back to V9 descriptions.

thanks,
Weiming

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jamal Hadi Salim" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2007 7:56 PM
Subject: Re: LC: draft-ietf-forces-protocol-10.txt>>comments


> On Thu, 2007-05-07 at 07:47 -0400, Avri Doria wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I hate to say it, but I think i agree.  what do other people think?
>> 
> 
> The input from the IESG review was to get rid of redundancy. Repeating
> everywhere that a specific TLV is being used or not is annoying.
> If the info is not redundant or adds clarity, then by all means add it
> back. 
> Weiming, you had many many revisions to review before this one - would
> have been useful for you to bring this up sooner. 
> 
> cheers,
> jamal