Re: Agenda Reqeusts

Viewed the v11 for some of the changes and satisfied with them. Thanks a lot for the work. 

Just thinking the added section "1.1 other notation" too nominent a little being the place. Can be better put in section 7, followed the forst paragraph?

thanks,
Weiming

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Avri Doria" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Agenda Reqeusts


> hi,
> 
> i can understand wanting there to be a slot request for the updated  
> drafts, unfortuantely i am not making one.  unfortunately i do not  
> have support for attending IETF meetings (no funding, no interested  
> employer, no money) and won't be there, so i will not ask for a  
> slot.  if someone else does, i will help them produce a report.
> 
> in terms of the draft changes, i still owe them and will try to send  
> a message indicating the changes to the protocol draft soon,
> 
> though in the meantime i do recommend viewing the diff at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/forces/draft-ietf-forces-protocol/draft-ietf- 
> forces-protocol-11-from-10.diff.html
> 
> btw, anyone can get status, latest and diffs for all the forces  
> drafts at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/forces/draft-ietf-forces-protocol/
> 
> and i will, on a volunteer basis, continue to update the doc until  
> such time as it gets through the IESG/RFC endgame.
> 
> a.
> 
> 
> 
> On 17 jul 2007, at 08.53, Patrick Droz wrote:
> 
>> So far I have not gotten a single agenda slot requests. Is nobody  
>> going to attend the forthcoming IETF. I had expected to hear  
>> something about the updated protocol draft and a status on the  
>> model. Please send slot request to me or the list.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Patrick
>> -- 
>>   Dr. Patrick Droz                  | [email protected]
>>   IBM Zurich Research Laboratory    | http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~dro
>>   Saumerstrasse 4                   | Tel. +41-44-724-85-25
>>   CH-8803 Rueschlikon/Switzerland   | Fax. +41-44-724-85-78
>