Section 1.1. placement was Re: Agenda Reqeusts

Hi,

Thanks for reviewing the changes

As for section 1.1 I am open to moving it.  It is just that it seemed  
to me that having all notation explained in one place, up front, made  
the most sense.  the question i ask myself is: if someone is looking  
at the second instance where the notation is being used, are they  
most likely to go back to the previous example if they have a  
question, or will they naturally for to either the beginning or to  
the end of the document.

Does anyone else care?

a.


On 21 jul 2007, at 01.28, Wang,Weiming wrote:

> Viewed the v11 for some of the changes and satisfied with them.  
> Thanks a lot for the work.
>
> Just thinking the added section "1.1 other notation" too nominent a  
> little being the place. Can be better put in section 7, followed  
> the forst paragraph?
>
> thanks,
> Weiming
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Avri Doria" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: Agenda Reqeusts
>
>
>> hi,
>>
>> i can understand wanting there to be a slot request for the updated
>> drafts, unfortuantely i am not making one.  unfortunately i do not
>> have support for attending IETF meetings (no funding, no interested
>> employer, no money) and won't be there, so i will not ask for a
>> slot.  if someone else does, i will help them produce a report.
>>
>> in terms of the draft changes, i still owe them and will try to send
>> a message indicating the changes to the protocol draft soon,
>>
>> though in the meantime i do recommend viewing the diff at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/forces/draft-ietf-forces-protocol/draft- 
>> ietf-
>> forces-protocol-11-from-10.diff.html
>>
>> btw, anyone can get status, latest and diffs for all the forces
>> drafts at:
>> http://tools.ietf.org/wg/forces/draft-ietf-forces-protocol/
>>
>> and i will, on a volunteer basis, continue to update the doc until
>> such time as it gets through the IESG/RFC endgame.
>>
>> a.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 17 jul 2007, at 08.53, Patrick Droz wrote:
>>
>>> So far I have not gotten a single agenda slot requests. Is nobody
>>> going to attend the forthcoming IETF. I had expected to hear
>>> something about the updated protocol draft and a status on the
>>> model. Please send slot request to me or the list.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Patrick
>>> -- 
>>>   Dr. Patrick Droz                  | [email protected]
>>>   IBM Zurich Research Laboratory    | http://www.zurich.ibm.com/~dro
>>>   Saumerstrasse 4                   | Tel. +41-44-724-85-25
>>>   CH-8803 Rueschlikon/Switzerland   | Fax. +41-44-724-85-78