Re: Which Working Group for ten64?
"John R Levine" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, 22 Mar 2026, Scott Morgan wrote: > No one, it's just an idea at this point (thus the errata). In that case, you might ask the Independent stream if they'll consider it. Other than that I'd just submit it as an I-D so it's in the archive and see if anyone's interested. Like Carsten, I don't see any interest in yet another specialized encoding. We've got the existing base 64, we've got JSON and CBOR to put structure into it, so something new would need to be much much better to get any traction. R's, John > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2026 at 3:52 PM John Levine <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It appears that Scott Morgan <[email protected]> said: >>> -=-=-=-=-=- >>> >>> Hi All, >>> >>> Which working group should I submit this draft to? >>> https://github.com/adligo/ten64.adligo.org/blob/main/rfc.xml >> >> Who's currently using this? >> >> R's, >> John >> >> >>> >>> I think I have removed all of the errata ;) >>> >>> TIA! >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Scott Morgan >>> President & CEO >>> Adligo Inc >>> http://www.adligo.com