Re: List moderator action
"Livingood, Jason" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <BY5PR11MB4258FB27B47D4924BCDD1B27C73E2@BY5PR11MB4258.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> |
On 5/5/26, 09:37, "Simon Josefsson" <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't believe the moderator decisions here will advance the effectiveness and reputation of the IETF. The apparant short-term success to silence and delay non-hybrid/NIST PQ crypto seems instead to have inspired policy changes to make this method easier to reach for. (no hats) Has anyone written a (clear & concise) Internet Draft on the technical aspects of this? WG mailing list debate is all well and good, but at the end of the day IMO it is no replacement for a clearly written internet draft explaining all of the detailed actual or potential technical risks and issues associated with one or another of various possible approaches. JL