Re: List moderator action

Stephen Farrell <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hiya,

On 05/05/2026 19:48, Livingood, Jason wrote:
> (no hats) Has anyone written a (clear & concise) Internet Draft on
> the technical aspects of this? WG mailing list debate is all well
> and good, but at the end of the day IMO it is no replacement for a
> clearly written internet draft explaining all of the detailed actual
> or potential technical risks and issues associated with one or
> another of various possible approaches.

I don't believe so, and the situation differs a lot depending
on whether you're considering key exchange or signatures, and
also depending on which protocol you're discussing.

I wrote up a description of what I saw as the state of play last
year [1], which probably still covers some of the controversial
points sufficiently, ([1], page 17) though I'm sure some people
would disagree:-)

Cheers,
S.

[1] https://pqcsa.eu/deliverables/pq-protocols.pdf
OpenPGP_signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 236 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

wnsEABYIACMWIQQwbnhHy1kPJkWsM6fk2On5l6gz3QUCafpLMgUDAAAAAAAKCRDk2On5l6gz3awq
AQCoKSYcxHcqLAuwOSRXlvJKlwjiSsHlDjRrerfp19hXmAEAlm6Au6qbPotsegGItqmIgQvhxlgz
eSsS4kVraychhgU=
=TvT+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.