RE: Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header

Well, to be precise, Location by reference has been in the SIP Location
header for a while, and no one has objected to that part of the text.

It's not in any location acquisition protocol yet, although EVERY ONE of the
L7 protocols has included it.

I, personally, would prefer if the only location-by-reference was a presence
subscription.  I think we have to allow that.  It would be nice if that was
it; one mechanism is always better than many if you can get away with it.

Brian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Schnizlein [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 20, 2006 10:19 AM
> To: Drage, Keith (Keith)
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: [Sip] Re: [Geopriv] Location-by-value in a SIP Location Header
> 
>  From where do you draw the idea that the WG agreed to location by
> reference?  There were several individual submissions on this subject,
> none of which reached consensus to even include as a WG item, much less
> as a WG consensus in favor.
> 
> John
> 
> On Jul 20, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Drage, Keith (Keith) wrote:
> 
> > In terms of previous WG agreements we have only two mechanisms:
> > -	location by value in a body
> > -	location by reference in a header
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
> This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
> Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
> Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip


_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list  https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [email protected] for questions on current sip
Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip