RE: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
"Winterbottom, James" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
To what do you send the SIP update and for what do you request the update? -----Original Message----- From: Andrew Newton [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 27 July 2006 11:47 AM To: Winterbottom, James Cc: Henning Schulzrinne; [email protected]; IETF SIP List Subject: Re: [Sip] RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance On Jul 26, 2006, at 9:28 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote: > In the case you mention below the reality is that if the target has > moved during the course of routing, the target will either be at > place B > by the time dispatch occurs, or at point C which may be further away > still. > At least in the case of a reference you have the possibility of > getting > the current location, which is not possible through any of the > "by-value" means described thus far unless the caller is stationary! > What about a SIP UPDATE? Section 5.3 of the draft. -andy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received it in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the original. Any unauthorized use of this email is prohibited. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [mf2] _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip