Re: RE: [Geopriv] Consensus on changes to location-conveyance
Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.sip,gmane.ietf.geopriv |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Jul 26, 2006, at 9:43 PM, Winterbottom, James wrote: > Andy, > > RFC-4119 says "However, the usage of this location object format is > not > limited to presence-using protocols-- any protocol that can > carry XML > or MIME types can carry PIDF." > > It seems to me that restricting the allowed schema in what is supposed > to be a location conveyance specification is in opposition to this > statement. Did somebody say that HTTP was a presence-using protocol? -andy ps. you can find my location with the following reference URIs: gopher://fatchance.hxr.us/you-still-have-a-gopher-client news:alt.locations.people.secretly-being-watched telnet://screen-scrapers.are.us/ dns:cached-publicly-around-the-world.com?type=HOST _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [email protected] for questions on current sip Use [email protected] for new developments on the application of sip